Comments on: Going to hell, if it’s up to cat-lovers

By: emjaybee

emjaybee — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:49:14 +0000

well, yes, I guess it IS self-centered of me not to want to take care of a cat! Oh, wait…it isn’t. You should only scoop an animal’s poop if doing so benefits you in some way (i.e., companionship you value). If not, then you’re just scooping poop for no reason. so to speak

By: mistee

mistee — Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:59:46 +0000

Soulless freak? No. Self-centered? Sounds like it.

By: rachael

rachael — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:10:56 +0000

LOL!

By: emjaybee

emjaybee — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:09:02 +0000

I love it that I get the most comments when I talk about 1. God and 2. cats.

Oh, internets.

By: rachael

rachael — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:54:00 +0000

i am a soulless freak too!

i am not opposed to the existence of cats, nor am i particularly bothered by other people loving on cats or whatever. what i can’t stand is a cat who behaves like the one you described, who needs attention ALL THE TIME and won’t get his/her butt/face/tail out from under my nose.

and seriously – litter trail on the carpet, where the baby plays? NOT cool.

By: Dean

Dean — Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:10:37 +0000

You’re the soulless freak.

Seriously, though, I actually agree with you. While I really wish I had a dog or a cat, that wish does not include all the maintenance that goes along with them. I think I’d have to hire a dog-walker.