An Interview with the Artist from Cesarean-Art.com

August 30th, 2006

cling.gif

I came across the artist several months ago and knew immediately that I wanted her work to find a wider audience. I didn’t get nibbles from some magazines I talked to, so screw ‘em; blogs are good for some things.

As a cesarean victim test subject survivor, it was a jolt to find someone expressing visually my own feelings of violation, of rage, of a wound that would never completely heal. She uses blood a lot in her images, but I will tell you that’s entirely appropriate. Feeling like a wounded bleeding dying animal, like a piece of meat, was part and parcel of my experience, too. It’s what happens when hospitals take away a person’s dignity and agency in the name of covering their ass. Birth is always a profound event, and the shock of being downgraded from woman-becoming-mother to a piece of ground chuck on a slab that the doctor can’t be bothered to talk to is something you never really get over. If you want to know what it feels like to have a c-section you know or suspect wasn’t necessary, you couldn’t start at a more honest place.

When did you start creating these images? There are 28 of them; when did you finish the last one?
I did the first two a few weeks after the surgery in October 2005. And thought I was done with it. Those were the image of the woman on the OR table and me holding my baby. But later I had the idea to make lots more and create a website. I also have a few unfinished ones, the last one started late May this year.

What is your reason for staying anonymous?
Basically, I want to speak out as a woman that could be any woman, not as my personal self, if that makes sense. And I don’t know why I should put my name on the site, anyways.

Was your first cesarean easier for you to deal with, or just as difficult?
I was back in my home country, tons of friends, family…yeah I felt sad back then, but was able to move on after a while.

You clearly have an illustration background. Have you considered publishing this art in a different format…as part of campaign against unnecessary cesareans, etc.? Has anyone approached you about other uses for your images?
I offer anybody who wants them hi-res files of the images to print and use for their own purposes (educational or personal) and have sent many batches to midwives, doulas and doctors who want to use them in classes and seminars just to show the emotional risks of c-sections. Publishing is not planned at the moment.

Do you think you suffered postpartum depression as a result of your c-section, or do you consider what you felt “simply” grief or anger, etc? Were you prescribed antidepressants, and did they help at all?
I was angered that my OB assumed that I suffer from PPD or have had “a hard childhood” or that I must have suffered something bad before etc. She did not want to believe that yes, it was really the c-section that made me so upset. I believe it to be what is called a post traumatic stress disorder. I have no symptoms of PPD in terms of problems with bonding, feeling suicidal and so on. I never took any medication. I don’t think there is something that would help against cesarean rage, but I’m sure people will come up with it.

What has affected you the most about the responses you’ve received (positive, negative, or both)?
Negative ones: the arrogance to “diagnose” somebody over the internet.
Positive ones: knowing that I’m not alone. That sounds simple but after nobody around me understood my feelings, I really believed I must be the only one!

Your work reminds me of Mucha; who are your influences?
Yeah, I like Mucha. Love him. Other than that I like anybody who works well on Adobe Illustrator.

What has helped the most, aside from creating your art, in dealing with your c-section?
Time. I have desperately searched for a quick solution but time is the only thing that really helps.

Oh Dear.

August 27th, 2006

Dear Nathan’s New Cousin: We are so sorry he tried to squash your head. Love, Nathan’s Parents.

more housecleaning

August 27th, 2006

just a note that I’ve been messing with my email setup; sadly, this means if you sent me an email at emjaybee@grabapple.net anytime in the last week, it’s gone. But if you send it again, I should get it now, if things work the way they’re supposed to. Leave a comment if you just can’t get hold of me otherwise.

Link List Pimpin’ #1: Cartooning and Animation

August 27th, 2006

Note: the images look stretched on some computers, normal on others. I have no idea why, so it’s just the way it is.–mjb

This is one of my favorite sections on this website. I really don’t draw that well, but I’ve always been fascinated by the whole process of cartooning, illustration, and animation. I think these artists do some of the best, and least-noticed, work out there today. The fact that the Internet allows every artist to have his or her own website and update it for a vast new audience is the biggest advance in artistic distribution since the printing press.

So, how do I choose the artists and sites I link to?

General Appreciation Sites

These include Cartoons for Grownups, which allows people who still watch “kid” shows to share their love of, say, Magilla Gorilla without shame.

Drawn! is a site for all those who create and love illustrations, whether in print or online. Some of the most amazing artwork can be found there, as well as salutes to great illustrators of the past.

Cartoon Brew concentrates on animation, such as old Tex Avery and Loony Tunes, and then newer projects such as those by Pixar or Nickelodeon. They also tend to find and post wondeful YouTube clips of bits from old Sesame Street episodes, commercials, and Disney shows that you can’t find anywhere else. Hours of time can be lost here.

Cartoonists’ and Animators’ Sites


All of the animator sites I currently have up belong to women, because under-representation of women in cartooning is still a HUGE problem, despite the amazing work they’ve been doing since the medium was born. I discovered many of these women through the work of Trina Robbins, a cartoonist herself who worked in the “wimmin’s comix” underground of the 70s.

Some of the women are fairly well known, such as Marjane Satrapi (Persepolis) and Lynn Johnston (For Better or For Worse). Others, such as Carol Lay and Lynda Barry aren’t as well know but have devoted fans and have been featured on Salon. The rest, Ariel Bordeaux, Ellen Forney, Fawn Gehwiler, Jessica Abel (Artbabe), Lee Marrs, Linda Medley, and Nina Paley, still get little recognition outside their own field (and sometimes not even then) despite decades of brilliant output.

Comics Criticism

People who love the comics also hate the comics, because there’s lots of crappy comics work out there. Happily, many of the critics turn their criticism into funny comics of their own. Very postmodern. The ones on my list take a feminist tack (Girls Read Comics (And They’re Pissed) or riff on boring comics that no one reads, like Apartment 3-G (Cartoon Curmudgeon). Drink at Work has it’s own satirical strips, like Teenage Girl President, which should really be a show on the WB (or CM, whatever it’s called now). And the vicious commenters at The Foobiverse really have it in for the For Better or For Worse storylines, and run Lynn Johnston through the wringer on a regular basis.

Sometimes I’ve wondered if I should take down this section, because most of my readers don’t seem all that interested in it. At the same time, I remember how much finding each of these sites was a revelation to me, how wonderful it was to find all these hidden treasures. And it’s my website, so who cares what parts get the most traffic? So enjoy.

Re-org-ing, and a new project

August 27th, 2006

Got rid of dead links and moved some links around. Added and changed a few categories, merged others. A little cyber-housecleaning if you will.

My new project will be to feature the links in each category on my link list, because there’s a lot of them, and I’d like to pimp them all a little, despite my tiny (but growing! unless that’s just the spambots showing up in my stats) readership.

I’m also going to be posting an interview I did online with one of the most amazing sites on my links list later this week. Check back soon.

Nine months and a few days’ change

August 24th, 2006

I don’t keep a baby book. I keep this blog, instead. I plan to print out all the relevant entries, along with all the congratulatory emails I got when Nathan was born, and put them in the little scrapbook I bought for him. If I had to physically get out a book and write things down, I’d never do it. Because I am not Martha Stewart, and crafts make me twitchy.

Without this blog, I might never have time to write down about the other day. How he rode in his carseat and squinted at the shafts of sunlight that swept over him, holding up his little white hands in them to see the light flicker.

How he twisted his head back in the seat to look at me when I sang along to the radio; how he then started a tuneless sort of crooning of his own, that might be singing, or might be editorial commentary on my singing. Though an acapella version of “If I Had a Pony” by Lyle Lovett almost always makes him smile.
How he was delighted to ride in the grocery cart like a big boy, grabbing with his giant baby hands to the sides as I wheeled him through the aisles, giving out his little “heh-heh” laughs as we went past the bright-colored trash cans and anything with Dora on it, because he loves her.

How he crawled and scooted all over the carpet in the kid’s section at Borders, following the pattern of planets and stars, till I had to run after him before he started chewing on the young adult novels.

How he talks in his sleep, a high-pitched “whoooooo, ooo-hoo,” which is the same sound he makes when he’s kneeling in his crib holding the bars and bouncing up and down. It’s like a soft, tiny, coyote wail.

How he also says “Dadadadada” all the time, but also says “Muhmuhmuhmuh” when I’m around or when he’s irritated or sad. I don’t know if that’s a compliment.

How I’m teaching him to chase me by getting down on the floor and crawling in front of him. He loves following me around while we crawl. He also loves pulling on my hair, trying to gouge out my eyes with his fat little baby fingers, and climbing on me like a mountain, all the while frantically panting “Heh heh heh heh!” to tell me his happiness. I don’t mind any of it, or the being drooled on either. It’s all love, isn’t it, the only way babies know how to say it.

I wouldn’t have time to put any of that in a scrapbook, and my handwriting is so bad you couldn’t read it if I did. Hooray for the internet.

I would also like to note that he’s starting to open drawers and pull on trash cans and take an interest in the fascinating world of power strips, so we spend a lot of time down on the floor keeping him safe, which suits him just fine. He thinks his 3 year old cousin M is the shiznit and follows her around even though he can’t keep up and she thinks he’s icky. As soon as he can run, she is going to have a permanent shadow. And just this week, he got her little brother as a new cousin, who we’ll call GC, a very normal-sized 7 something pounds:

gc

Nathan, on the other hand, went to the doctor last week. At nine months, he weighs 27.5 pounds and is 30 inches long.

My arms? So tired.

God the Mother, and a baby parade

August 20th, 2006

So I went to church this morning. I know! Crazy! It was a Unity church, which is not Unitarian, but rather (if you follow the link) a group that focuses on a more mystical, less smitey sort of God. This particular church is tremendously involved in its community; a lot of charity work, Habitat for Humanity, supporting desperate families, and so on. They’re a lot more concerned about such things then about whether some gay person, somewhere, is getting it on in an unauthorized way. Which I find refreshing.

It was very strange but also sort of neat to hear the familiar cadences of a preacher being pronounced in a woman’s voice, too. And to hear God being referred to as a mother as well as a father by someone who was not wearing (as far as I knew) faux-Celtic tattoos.
The pastor and assistant pastor are both women, as is the choir director.*

The pastor was decent, especially during the prayer/meditation section of the ceremony. Her sermon scripture was Exodus, and since I’ve always found the Old Testament a little dry, didn’t grab me all that much. But her main point, about God finding you where you are in your life, is something I absolutely think is true.**

The bonus was at the end, though. I had dropped Nathan off in the nursery with a little trepidation; the nursery lady’s name was Brigitta and she had ze Austrian aczent, mein Herr. But seemed nice. She gave me a pager in case of emergency/baby meltdown, so I wouldn’t spend the whole service wanting to check on him. It didn’t go off, and so by the end of the sermon, I was eager to go back and pick him up. And then the pastor said “And now let’s hear from the children,” and in they trooped, all the Sunday schoolers, while the congregation kept singing. Nathan was the only baby, although he easily outweighed the next-oldest toddler, and so was being pushed along at the head of a baby parade in a rainbow-colored stroller, like Caesar in his chariot, but utterly confused. I laughed so hard I had tears in my eyes, though you couldn’t hear me over the singing. It was the most preposterous thing I had ever seen.

He did all right at first, squashed into his stroller, looking around at all the people and the bright lights as Brigitta told the congregation about the Sunday School lesson, which was something about angels, and showed off the glitter-covered angels everyone had made. There was one for Nathan too. And then it was time for the last song, and that was it for Nathan. He howled in panic at the music and the strangers and the lights and probably Brigitta. It was all too much, and I rushed forward and picked him up while everyone smiled to reassure me it was all right. He kept howling after the music stopped and the pastor had to accept my hurried thanks while I hustled him to the car.

But it was nice. Unity is a non-proseltyzing faith, so I have no fear of strangers showing up at my doorstep with a paperback Bible and probing into my spiritual state of mind so it can be categorized (A: Saved; B: Unsaved) and acted on accordingly. So I may go back, though I might leave Nathan at home till he’s old enough for the baby parade.

*The choir, sadly, was terrible. They tried so hard, but yet, the notes could not be found. I think the music director writes his own music, though, so maybe it was his fault.

**On days when I believe, that is.

Some families are created, not born

August 10th, 2006

c

Most of my friends don’t have kids. Nonetheless, one of my oldest friends has added to her family this year. After years of mentoring kids from the poorest neighborhoods of San Antonio, and one girl especially, my friend Christina legally
adopted her; never mind that the “girl” was now 22. Chris had been her defacto mom for years, had seen her through high school and college and endless legal troubles to get her siblings and herself out of an abusive situation. And now they’re legally mom and daughter.

It’s a decision that seems a little unusual, unless you can imagine yourself as a 22 year old, right out of college, with no parents to talk to. No one to take care of you when you’re sick, help you move, help you make big decisions, be there to cry for you on your wedding day, buy you birthday gifts, be a grandma to your kids. I lost my father when I was 20, and if I had lost my mother too, my life since then would have been so much harder and lonelier. I’m 35, and I still lean on her strength.

We don’t stop growing up when we hit 18; the older we get, in fact, the more we value our parents’ help and understanding. And for Christina’s new daughter, a girl who didn’t get much parenting in her childhood, there’s a lot to be said for getting all she can now.

And for my friend Christina, the adoption papers are just a legal blessing on the caring and love she’s given to her daughter; their real family was already formed years ago, in the bitterness and struggle, in the dark times, the late night phone calls, the social worker visits, the tears outside the courthouse, the struggles to keep up in school, to get out of poverty, to dream. That’s when Christina became a mom. That’s when the real adoption took place. She’s as much of a mom as I’ll ever be, because she was there when it counted. And that’s why I’m proud of them both.

Head uncovered, speaking in church, devoid of submission

August 7th, 2006

(post contains cursing!)

I’m reading Under the Banner of Heaven, Jan Krakauer’s book about the polygamist sects of Mormonism, and it’s hard going. Because I keep wanting to throw up, and then to jump in my car, drive to Utah, and shoot several child-raping, incestuous, godbag assholes in the head.

Instead, after loosing that stream of invective, I’ll tell you why I am a raging feminist and have a violent reaction to the apostle Paul.

Mostly, it’s because of this little beaut of a woman-hatin’ set of verses.

But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God…For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man…

and then this

Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.

Oh, and this one:

A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner. But women will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.

Probably, if you were raised in the strain of fundamentalism that I was, especially if you’re a woman, those verses will be painfully familiar to you. They are the verses that are waved in your face from the time you’re a girl, telling you why you can’t ever be as good as a man in God’s eyes, why your talents and your body (especially your uterus) belong to other (male) people, why you matter less.

Oh, it’s dressed up in pretty words, words like “headship” and “servanthood” and “serving the Lord” and “fulfilling your purpose in life” and other vaguely S&M-sounding phrases about how great it is that you get to get stepped on, because after all, that’s what you were designed to do! As though you do not really exist except as a reflection in a man’s eyes; as though you, yourself, were not an entire soul. Unless you were good at having kids, and then only maybe.

I won’t really try to get into all of Paul’s justifications for writing such hateful and misogynistic claptrap and irreparably damaging all the women who were to be part of the growing church (and lots who weren’t) except to note that his doctrine that “them what’s created first should be in charge” seems to imply that the animals should be running the show, since they came before Adam. But I digress.

I sat in church for years and listened to this stuff, and tried, because I was a good Christian girl, to believe it. I mean, I tried. I prayed. I came up with the theory that if I found the right guy, why, it would be ok and easy to submit to him. I worried that I was too proud.

And then one day, I snapped out of it.

I said to God, OK, if this is real? Count me out. Because I can’t go with it. I am not just someone’s helpmeet, and I don’t believe there is a man out there so wonderful and perfect that I could be ok letting him make all the decisions for both of us. And if you, God, are real, then you made a big mistake giving me a complete brain and then telling me to turn off 85 percent of it to please the male half of this species. Either you don’t exist, you’re a real jerk, or Paul had serious issues with women and was lashing out by telling them to sit down and shut up.

Maybe he was jealous. After all, Christ spent a large amount of his time on earth with women, many with some means of their own, who supported him. He never said anything about wishing they would just be more submissive and shut up already so the menfolk could get to work.

Maybe that created a contingent of independent minded women in the Church that Paul found threatening. He was busy consolidating, establishing priestly hierarchies in a way similar to those of the Jewish faith he was raised in. Uppity women didn’t fit his paradigm. So he used his power to shut them up, as the church has done ever since.

It’s called Patriarchy, and it’s the ugly scar running through all of recorded human history. It may be the very first prejudice, the first time one part of humanity said to the other part “You are not as human as we are, therefore we can do what we like to you.”

Patriarchy has taken some hits ever since Christianity (in the form of various apostate rebellious sects) and then the Enlightenment came along. Every time things have gotten better enough that women were able to get hold of education and money, they have gained a little ground here, a little there. They lost ground many times, but have always come back, always pressed against the boundaries. Democracy helped, a free press, and then getting the vote. We still have a ways to go.

Be that as it may, we don’t see Patriarchy so nakedly in our daily lives, here in America, most of the time. Sexism is more underground, less talked-about, less overt, most of the time; it’s no longer acceptable for the government to kill women for daring to make their own choices. That still happens in Kabul, in Saudi, in other places around the world, but not legally here.

Except in places like the enclaves that Krakauer talks about. There we see that even here, even in our forward-thinking, enlightened country, all it takes is a few crackpots who are able to isolate themselves and their families for Arizona to turn into Afghanistan. Patriarchy is very old, and feminism’s victories are very new. There are still people in this country who think women are property, who think God wants them to rule as slavemasters because of what’s between their legs, that the patriarch can never be wrong because he is the patriarch, and God has made him the head of the woman, who exists only to serve him.

I will never go back to the church I was raised in, because they are merely on the milder end of the curve of this hatred, because they have made it more important to pursue the flawed doctrine of fundamentalism than to address the injustice of denigrating just over half of the human race to secondary status. In the nineteenth century, Paul’s words were also used to justify the abominable practice of slavery. This is no different. My church isn’t alone; it has lots of company on that woman-hating spectrum, which is why I stay outside of most church walls.

When I first began to understand that because I was female, I was a target for a vast assembly of rapists, loudmouth harrassers, flashers, grabby scumbags, abusers, and even the majority of serial killers, it was a hard blow to recover from. It still is. It’s like being a deer in a society filled with hunters; maybe they’ll come after you, maybe they won’t.

I cannot describe to a guy what it feels like to know there are actually significant numbers of men out there who will put date-rape drugs in women’s drinks, who will stalk them and kill them, who will say filthy things to them in the workplace and then threaten to fire them or worse if they tell. You cannot imagine. You really cannot imagine. It is not the same as being afraid of a random mugging. It is not the same as being afraid of a murderer on the loose. It is a fear specific only to being a woman in a world that has, for most of its history, seen me as nothing but a piece of meat, property to be stolen, bought, and abused.

The first time a stranger tried to stalk me was when I was 10. My friend Erica saw him; I didn’t. Thank God she was with me. We were walking to the burger place down the block, alone, two 10 year old girls. She said to me “That man’s following us.” A nondescript man, mustache, gray jacket, slacks. Maybe glasses. I didn’t really believe her, but to be sure, we ducked into a store that sold appliances and crouched down behind the washing machines. The man came into the store. He looked around for a bit, frowned, and left. We never told anyone; we didn’t really understand how dangerous it was.

The second time I was in high school, taking a walk through my parents’ neighborhood. A rusty gray car, out of place in our neighborhood, passed me slowly, and then slowed down some more. I got nervous and walked up away from the street, onto people’s lawns and closer to the houses. The car passed, and I kept walking, thinking, I’d imagined it. Then the same car appeared at the end of the street, coming back toward me, more quickly. I quickly turned and cut between the houses to my parent’s backyard, and ran into my house. I liked to exercise, I loved to explore, but it was hard to keep going for walks after that.

Ever since, I keep my eyes open. It’s normal for me, for millions of women, to keep our eyes open. To never walk alone in dark places, to maybe carry a gun, mace, a whistle. To always be a little bit afraid. To often feel like it’s too dangerous to leave the house. To be in a mobile prison of fear that we carry everywhere. To know that even if we get assaulted, survive and report it, someone will try to say we deserved it, we weren’t careful enough, because we did leave the house, we didn’t wear a burka, we had a drink, we smiled at a stranger in a moment of unguarded friendliness.

That’s Patriarchy. That’s evil. It has to stop. And until the church recognizes that, it’s participating in evil, too, and I have nothing to do with it.