Dang!

February 28th, 2007

I was linked by Susie Bright! Wow.

It’s like when a rock band’s bus drives by you on the freeway, and a band member waves from the window. They don’t know you, they won’t remember the meeting, but you’re all calling your friends “Omigod, ya’ll, they totally waved to me!”

It’s good to know my less than wonderful DZ experience bought me a tiny bit of internet notice. Not as much as my entry that attracted all the weird Michael Jackson-lovin’ people (since deleted because they CREEPED me OUT), but us eighth-tier bloggers are happy to get noticed at all.

Last of the Geekhicans

February 24th, 2007

dzgirl.jpg
At far right; DZ alum Pat Priest!

This article rings eerily familar to me, because at my university, I was the one who broke our Delta Zeta chapter; the last woman recruited and admitted before the national organization shut it down. (I kind of take pride in that, although the chapter would’ve been shut down whether I’d joined or not).

I never had any interest in sororities when I was “rushed” by DZ; but it was full of women I knew and admired, smart, straight-A types. And yeah, some of them were overweight, or butch, or just not the bowhead sorority type. That’s why I joined. That’s why I put up with the exorbitant fees, the asinine social events (dances, balls, cutesy-pie fundraisers), the ridiculous initiation (learning DZ history, memorizing the founding members and being quizzed, for god sakes, and learning a secret handshake–sorry, nothing more exciting than that), the sneering of other Greeks on campus who thought of us as rejects. (whereas we thought of them as airheads, with a few exceptions). The stupid colors (pink and green) and mascot (turtle) which we were supposed to decorate ourselves with on various occasions. I liked the girls, who were funny and sarcastic and weird and supportive. I could put up with pink and green turtles if I had to.

But it was a bad fit, Geek and Greek, at least if you were a woman. We had the highest GPA of any sorority on our campus; we raised money for good causes; we paid our dues. But we weren’t big enough, and we weren’t bringing in enough money, and in the end, that did us in.

Social sororities are nothing but money-sucking organizations that claim to be dedicated to vague goals of do-gooding and sisterhood, but are not really about anything but the dues. They sell exclusivity, based on a code of looks and behavior straight out of the 1950s, which was the last time they were truly powerful. The girls in our group, like those in the NYT article, tried to change that, to make them about the ideals sprinkled throughout their literature, of upstanding behavior, sisterly support, community involvement, and fun. We thought it would work, because we were naive and young and took what we were told at face value. And so we got closed down.

We might have simply had some members booted, like the girls in the article, but to be honest, almost all of us were “socially awkward” by Greek standards; it’s hard not to be when you’re a woman who’s a math major, or a history major, or Hispanic, or wear glasses, or stand 5′11″ or 5′1″, or throw a killer softball, or regularly kick guys’ asses at chess. Hardly any of us had boyfriends; most of us didn’t care, except when another stupid social rolled around and we had to scare up a date. We didn’t pair up with frats often, because most of them were assholes; we preferred the computer geek, D&D-playing guys who were our friends.

Some of us were closeted lesbians; one girl left for that reason, because coming out would probably have gotten her booted.

In the end, we were like girls who believe that beauty pageants really are about awarding scholarships, and not about boobs and butts. It’s astonishing that we lasted as long as we did.

So they took our charter, that had been in place at our university for most of the century, and booted us from our campus digs, and another sorority was chosen by the university to come in and replace us. We were told by National that all dues we’d paid were non-refundable, and supposedly under the control of our local alumnae. But National didn’t count on our math major treasurer; with a little bit of book-cooking, she got the money out of the bank before it could be sent off–and we threw a killer party. Several bits of accumulated sorority furniture and appliances also mysteriously disappeared from our room before anyone from National could come claim them. Strange, that. Don’t know what happened to them!

The writing is on the wall for DZ and other social greek organizations, when it comes to recruiting the true best and brightest. Coed fraternities and service fraternities were making a huge impact on my campus when I left, because they cared more about what you did than who you were and looked just as good on a resume. They did not require you to be a bimbette or let frats grope you at parties. They did not care if you were a “legacy” whose mother or father had been a member.

And that’s the way it needs to be.

Grass is tasty

February 22nd, 2007

nathanfeb07_4.jpg

Slapdash

February 21st, 2007

Just a portmanteau post today.

1. Nathan doesn’t need surgery. According to Jim the Perky Neurosurgeon. The guy was the most upbeat doctor ever. Anyway, he doesn’t think Nathan’s head is going to grow enough more in his life to cause anything but a slightly odd shape. No brain pressure, no freakishness. I hope he’s right, because after Nathan is two, it’s way harder to operate on his skull. Shudder. Meanwhile, Nathan continues to think of walking as a hobby, not a job, but remains on track otherwise developmentally, so I tend to think he’s not behind. He’s like the guy who loves vinyl because it’s retro and lo-fi. All those other kids can run around upright and listen to their iPods, but Nathan will be moving to his own groove, crawling when he wants to, workin’ it old-school, watching his vintage Sesame Street DVD and not sweating it. And that’s ok.

2. A friend asked me about Texas gov Perry’s decision to make the cervical cancer vaccine mandatory. I told her even a bigoted shallow stopped clock is right twice a day. Meaning that even if he’s doing it for his buddies at Merck, it’s a good idea and I’m all for it. And it’s not “mandatory” if the parents who oppose it fill out a form; five minutes, and they can opt out of protecting their daughters from cancer. Don’t know why they would, but hey, they’ve got the right. I’m hearing a lot of foofaraw about it not being tested enough yet, which I would kind of listen to, except the people saying so are generally the kind who think giving girls access to birth control is bad too. So I tend to think they’re less about protecting their daughters than they are squicked out about the thought that said daughters will, someday, most likely have sex. Never mind that cancer will kill them…they might have sex! Priorities seem a bit askew, here. Would they protest so much if it protected boys from penile cancer? One wonders.

3. Via midlifemidwife, this movie trailer has me intrigued.

4. Bush’s new budget: taking away 28 billion from Medicaid and giving 32.7 billion to Sam Walton’s family. Among other atrocities. One thing I will say about Bush; he’s consistent. A consistent asshole.

Best quote ever about me

February 15th, 2007

“…I don’t know how the world ever got along without emjaybee around to tell us what’s wrong with it.”

Hey, I don’t know either!

When I can’t top ‘em, I link ‘em

February 9th, 2007

I was having a hard time figuring out what to say about Anna Nicole Smith’s death; not because I followed her career, but because her life was short, sad, and severely messed up even though she had a face and body that got her the kind of male attention most women think they would love to have.

But then I went over to Twisty’s blog only to find she’d summed up what bothered me about Smith’s death in one graceful angry bit of prose:

…the entire beauty industry’s primary product..is a pernicious, often debilitating insecurity. This neurosis is as brilliantly marketed as the “cure”: the obsessive purchase of absurd clothing, “scientifically formulated” toxic glop, devices that torment, and harrowing surgeries the sole purpose of which is to advertise one’s status as a receptacle for male incontinence.

If any doubts linger as to the sinister essence of the feminine directive marketed by the beauty industry, I urge you to consider the painful case of poor Anna Nicole Smith, dead of femininity at age 39. Blonde bombshells are disturbingly disposable.

Feminimity* kills, especially if you’re really really good at it.

*Feminism 101 definition: “Feminimity” is something feminists define not as being a woman, but as playing a role, acting and living the way you think “feminine” women are supposed to. As opposed to just actual women, who are women regardless of whether they wear pink, skirts, makeup, or heels. Any drag queen can be feminine. Which might lead us to ask, what is the reason for believing women need to be “feminine” to be real women? Susan Brownmiller wrote an excellent book about just that.

Lights, camera, puberty

February 3rd, 2007

I worked on a video shoot today, for my employer, doing a film for our clients. It was hard not to find it all terribly glamorous, low-budget and small market though it was. We rented out a local school and brought in a few kid actors and a bunch of extras, fed them pizza and Cokes, and filmed a scenario partially written and edited by yours truly!

Squee!

It was really very fun. The kid actors were such old pros, they’d been at it since they were wee tots. They brought extra wardrobe, knew their lines, got their expressions and gestures down with some coaching. Our director and a contractor had gone over my original script and made the dialogue workable, but really didn’t change all that much, which made me feel pretty good. The director, who, as one of our actors pointed out, looked like Alec Baldwin, was very good at getting the kids focused and emoting. I met and chatted with the grip and the lights guy and the audio guy (it was exactly like talking to roadies, by the way–big beefy guys with tattoos, knit caps, and interesting personal histories that may or may not include jail), and it was all just a kick.

Anyway, we got past the morning shoot, and brought in the extras, and then the fun started. One of our actors revealed his unbearable hamminess when faced with an audience, and had to be refocused a lot. I think that kid is a lot more likely to go into comedy than acting…he kept doing what sounded like Chris Rock bits. To be fair, he was pretty damn funny at it, which would be great except he kept cracking up our actor who was there to play “slightly depressed girl.”

It was so strange to sit there in a classroom looking at all these middle schoolers in their desks, knowing most of them probably feel deeply neurotic and hopeless a lot of the time, and just seeing how beautiful, for lack of a better word, they were. Even the ones who were “goofy” looking, there was just something about them that made me happy. All that energy and hope, maybe. All that potential, bottled up in one room, for them to do well and become interesting adults and do surprising things that I could never think of.

I’m sure it’s parenting making me think this way. Thinking of Nathan being one of those kids, slouched in a desk, wearing sloppy clothes to show his independence, full of equal parts great ideas and complete ignorance, bratty and sweet and wonderful and exasperating. What an interesting thing it will be to see him become that.

I know kids drive you crazy, teens more so, ok, we’ve all heard those jokes, I know it’s true. Not many people seem to talk about the good things about teenagers, how they can work so hard to understand, how they can hold on to their decency despite being in a constant swirl of hormones and aggression and drama, how much fun it is to talk to them when they’re figuring stuff out, to see them do something they love or learn something new. They have so much dignity, and so much goofiness at the same time.

It’s a long way off of course. Today, Nathan grabbed his flash card with the apples on it, and said “Ahhhhpulll, ahhhpull” to me, which he’s done before. But then he went to his highchair and banged on the tray; “AHHHHpullll, ahhhhpulll!” So I got him some apple bits, and he was happy, and I was amazed, because he’s surprised me again with how much he’s figuring stuff out. Today ahhpull; tomorrow, the car keys. That is SO awesome.

Goodbye, goop-eye

February 1st, 2007

Nathan now has a tube in one tear duct that will hopefully clear up his constant gooey eye. The surgery went fine, and the pediatric surgery center was quite nice, with a big playroom and the Wiggles (shudder) on the overhead TV to distract your kids from the fact they’re about to be prodded in some painful way or other.

I was wondering how I would handle it when they took Nathan away to prep for surgery (which is just giving him the anesthetic and taking off his shoes for an IV; they don’t make them change clothes). Because he was already past Grumpy to I HATE YOU ALL mode after a night of no liquids and getting up at 4am to drive across town to the surgery. It was cold and raining too. I was braced for complete and total screaming hysterics when we had to hand him over.

But! Instead, they got him high first. They gave him some kind of nose drops, and within minutes his pupils were dialated and he was spacey and quiet. He went with the nurse without a peep.

30 minutes later, all was done. His nose is bloody from being intubated for oxygen, and he has some surgical tape goo on his ankle. He cried until the second we gave him a bottle, then it was lights out. He’s been napping on and off all day, and now I’m just waiting for him to stop making faces in the mirror in our room and get tired enough for bed.

Kind of a practice run for Big Scary surgery coming up, probably next month. Poor little Frankenbaby.